By Eboni Marshall Turman, Ph.D.,
I had just returned to New York City from delivering the 2018 Trout Lectures at Trinity Lutheran Seminary in Columbus, Ohio, when I received word that my beloved professor, now colleague and friend, Dr. James Hal Cone, had died.
In 2012, Dr. Cone had been invited to lecture at Trinity Lutheran but had to cancel his appearance due to an onslaught of death threats in response to his newest publication at the time, The Cross and the Lynching Tree.
Amid the outpouring of “thoughts and prayers” the world over and a host of remembrances held in his honor at divinity schools and theological seminaries across the nation, the truth is that James H. Cone was, in fact, the most hated theologian in America at one time.
The first African American to earn a Ph.D. in systematic theology from Northwestern University in 1963, Cone often recalled how some of his graduate professors refused to shake his hand at his commencement given their racist disbelief in the successful completion of his degree.
Following graduation, it would not take long for Cone to reposition his expertise in the theology of Karl Barth to the God-talk of his mother, Mrs. Lucy Cone, a pillar, he would say, of the Macedonia African Methodist Episcopal Church in Bearden, Ark., spurning him to interrogate the question at the heart of black life in the U.S.: What does God have to say about “why whites treat blacks so terrible?”
Although his specific place in the genealogy of black liberation theology is debatable, Cone is unquestionably its 20th-century systematizer and as such, is noted as the father of liberation theology.
“Cone carefully began the work of dismantling a dominant white theology, but further identifying the white church as the Antichrist…”
Beginning with his first now-classic monograph, Black Theology & Black Power, immediately followed by three more, A Black Theology of Liberation; The Spirituals and the Blues; and God of the Oppressed, Cone carefully began the work of dismantling a dominant white theology, but further identifying the white church as the Antichrist insofar as it undergirded and perpetuated black suffering as the white supremacist will of God, or worse yet, remained silent in the face of black dehumanization.
He condemned the white, blond-haired, blue-eyed Jesus—the prominent icon in so many Christian churches and homes—to the auspices of hell with rhetoric that demanded that, “If God is white, kill God.”
Instead, he aligned with the god of the Hebrew prophets and Jesus, and asserted that God and God in Christ are black insofar as they stand on the side of the oppressed, acting in history to liberate the suffering “by any means necessary.”
Emerging at the radical interstices of Martin Luther King Jr.’s black Christian faith that demanded justice, and Malcolm X’s resounding call for black power, Cone’s black theology of liberation fearlessly asserted racism as heresy and proclaimed a God of the oppressed who stood against racism in all its forms.
And the white church and its theologians hated him for it.
They hated him for clearly and uncompromisingly identifying the paradox of white theologians who “scarcely uttered a word about white inhumanity toward blacks” as the arbiters of “the nature of the gospel and of the discipline responsible” for explaining it. They hated him for deploying their beloved German theologians to indict white American theology for its moral failure.
[easy-tweet tweet=”“Oppressors never like to hear the truth in a sociopolitical context defined by their lies.”” via=”no” usehashtags=”no” template=”qlite”]
In the 1986 edition of A Black Theology of Liberation, Cone recalled how white theologians referred to black theology as a “Nazi mentality;” as a “theology filled with hatred for white people and the assumption of the moral superiority of black over white.” He remembered how “white theologians wanted me to debate with them about … whether ‘black theology’ was real theology.” He recounted how white men would call him “angry” and “hostile” as a way of marking his scholarship as morally untrustworthy rather than truth-filled. But Cone’s response was always precise: “Oppressors never like to hear the truth in a sociopolitical context defined by their lies.”
White Jesus has cache in the conservative black church too, where the absurdity of white racist theology demands the disjointedness of blackness and Christian faith..
Black churches were not much better, with their oft-misguided aspirations toward white respectability. Cone admitted that the AME church “supported his teaching ministry … and defended his right to speak and write from his theological convictions,” but let’s not be deceived. White Jesus has cache in the conservative black church too, where the absurdity of white racist theology demands the disjointedness of blackness and Christian faith and where black theology’s assertion of the black Christ is understood as “racism in reverse.”
In the wake of Cone’s death, those who never thought to call his name or add his texts to their syllabi are now fondly referring to him as “Jim,” feigning personal intimacy and intellectual respect. Institutions that would have never invited him to speak are sending forth their “thoughts and prayers” in ways that lend more to colonizing his legacy than carrying it forth.
To be sure, men have long been sanitized posthumously to assuage and erase the guilt of those left behind. Of course, Martin Luther King Jr., who was the most hated man in America at the time of his assassination in front of Room 306 on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tenn., is a prime example of U.S. amnesia rooted in the sterilization of the legacies of black freedom fighters.
Interestingly enough, this phenomenon also works in reverse. Billy Graham stands as a more recent exemplar of how a white racist Christian past can be completely expunged in the glory of death. Womanist theological ethicist Emilie M. Townes identifies such maneuvers as the cultural production of evil that, echoing W.E.B. Du Bois, “paints perfect men [but] … does not tell the truth.”
The truth is that Cone was far from perfect. Some of his closest friends and colleagues like Gayraud S. Wilmore, Vincent Harding, Charles S. Long, and even his dear brother, Cecil Cone, made sure to remind him of this regularly. Black womanist theologians and ethicists like Katie G. Cannon, Jacquelyn Grant, Delores S. Williams, Kelly Brown Douglas, as well as Townes, would emerge in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, respectively, to assert even more blind spots within black liberation theology, especially in relation to the invisibility of black women, and later, black sexuality.
In his For My People: Black Theology and the Black Church and later editions of his earliest works, Cone would be led to reflect in a sustained way on the weaknesses of his system, especially its development as an overreaction to white racism, as well as its lack of social, economic and gender analysis.
While some continue to disingenuously characterize his critique as angry, hostile and excessively harsh, what must never be forgotten is the depth of his love for black people.
Nevertheless, his fiery rhetoric and scathing critique of church, academy and society was a wake-up call to the entire Christian community. While some continue to disingenuously characterize his critique as angry, hostile and excessively harsh, what must never be forgotten is the depth of his love for black people.
Cone’s profound love and abiding joy for black life surfaced every time he stood in front of a classroom or put pen to paper or heard the spirituals and the blues. His love surfaced in his passion for black art, black dance, and his celebration of black excellence lived out loud in the face of white supremacy and its goons.
The most hated theologian in America built an entire disciplinary field. He authored more than 12 books and over 150 articles. He trained, chided and developed more generations of black theologians and black pastors than any other systematic theologian in the contemporary world. He taught us that God is black and that black is beautiful, baby. He did all of this because he loved us so.
I must have called James Hal Cone’s name over 100 times in the lecture hall at Trinity Lutheran Seminary where, just a few years prior, death threats had urged his retreat. As I sat in the airport that Friday afternoon on my way back to New York City, just hours before he would take his last breath, I penned a letter to him as an “end time” reminder of an enduring black and deeply Christian hope, that the most hated shall also be our most loved.
Dr. Eboni Marshall Turman is Assistant Professor of Theology and African American Religion at Yale University Divinity School in New Haven, CT. She formerly served as Assistant Research Professor of Theological Ethics, Black Church Studies, and African & African American Studies and Director of the Office of Black Church Studies at Duke University Divinity School.
An author, ordained minister, professor, and public theologian, the Reverend Dr. Marshall Turman is a refreshing addition to our most pressing national discussions of faith, race and gender. With a decidedly womanist point of view, hers stands out as one of very few scholarly millennial voices offering moral perspective on issues facing the Black community.